Thursday, January 15, 2015

Corporate frauds rose by over 45 per cent in India in the last two years - Is your Internal Audit function upto it?

As per a recent article in Economic Times Corporate frauds rose by over 45 per cent in India in the last two years and the lurking risk has been dissuading global companies from investing in India, said a study. 

Corporate frauds arose out of corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, window dressing, financial reporting fraud and bribery due to weaknesses in internal controls, scarcity of resources and over-riding powers of senior management, it added. 

The study by Assocham and Grant Thornton said companies related t .. 

Report: Independent commission didn’t allow independent auditing


As reported by - watchdog.org http://watchdog.org/192474/independent-commission-didnt-allow-independent-auditing-report-says/

The top internal auditor for a state agency that has a say in your electric bill might have had to choose between keeping a job and telling the honest-to-goodness truth.
The chief internal auditor of the State Corporation Commission has been reporting to the chief administrative officer, instead of directly to the agency’s three General Assembly-appointed commissioners.
The arrangement sets up a potential conflict of interest, a new audit from the Auditor of Public Accounts says.
The chief internal auditor, meant to operate as independently as possible, could have risked putting his job on the line to report any administrative failings to his boss, or the chief administrative officer could have left out embarrassing details.
“A lack of organizational independence could lead to management pressures affecting the objectivity of the commission’s chief internal auditor,” an audit from the state Auditor of Public Accounts, which regularly reviews state agencies, said. “As a result of the chief internal auditor only reporting to management, its assessments of management may appear to be influenced by this relationship.”
That needs to change, the state auditor said.
“The commission should establish a reporting line between the chief internal auditor and the commissioners for conducting risk assessments, establishing work plans, and issuing audit reports to protect the auditor’s objectivity,” the state audit noted.
The SCC commissioners told the Auditor of Public Accounts they’ve already changed.
By Kathryn Watson | Watchdog.org, Virginia Bureau
ALEXANDRIA, Va. —

Monday, January 12, 2015

Internal report helped Mexico to gets green light: DOT ‘opening door’ to cross-border trucking

Sourced from http://fleetowner.com/
http://fleetowner.com/fleet-management/mexico-gets-green-light-dot-opening-door-cross-border-trucking
Less than a month after an internal audit concluded a pilot program lacked enough participants to be statistically conclusive, the Dept. of Transportation said Friday that Mexican motor carriers will soon be able to apply for authority to conduct long-haul, cross-border trucking services in the United States.
Fully opening the border to approved carriers is “a significant milestone” in the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, according to the DOT statement. The policy change ends a 20-year political dispute over the NAFTA trucking provision, and is expected to result in the permanent termination of more than $2 billion in annual retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.
And the certainty over that economic impact outweighed the statistical uncertainty from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s three-year test program to evaluate the safety impact of granting long-haul authority to Mexico-based trucking companies.
While the recently published audit by the DOT Office of Inspector General did not make any recommendations, it did determine that FMCSA “established sufficient monitoring and enforcement activities” to meet a lengthy list of requirements mandated by Congress. The audit also confirmed FMCSA’s analysis: Pilot program participant carriers, as well as Mexico-domiciled and Mexican-owned carriers with existing authority to operate in the U.S., performed no worse than U.S. and Canadian motor carriers.

Internal Audit touches Football Associations

Internal Audit findings were used by Prince Ali to create the basis for the banning for life from involvement in professional football of former FIFA executive committee member and AFC President Mohammed Bin Hammam. However, he failed in getting the Asian group to act on recommendations of an internal audit conducted by PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) to possibly file criminal and civil charges against the disgraced official and renegotiate if not cancel the AFC’s $1 billion master rights agreement with Singapore-based World Sports Group. The burial of the audit by Bin Hammam’s successor, Sheikh Salman, serves as another indicator of resistance to change within Asian and world football governance.

For full article refer to http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/a-vote-for-ali-is-a-vote-for-change--and-challenge.aspx?pageID=238&nID=76784&NewsCatID=365

Why SMEs should embrace financial audits

© Zawya BusinessPulse 2015

© Zawya BusinessPulse 2015
A financial audit involves a comprehensive examination of a business' financial transactions and positions, and is something that large corporations are required to do every year. SMEs are subject to less demanding reporting requirements, but a full annual audit is something that they should still be doing as a matter of course.
There are two kinds of auditing - internal and external. An internal audit is so called because it's conducted by an employee of the company rather than an external auditor. When it comes to SMEs, any internal audit is likely to be carried out by the business owners themselves. If budgets are limited, a company is unlikely to want to employ a full-time auditor as it just doesn't make financial sense.
An external audit is conducted by an outside body that will objectively examine the business' finances as well as look closely at how well internal controls are working. It's worth keeping in mind that for some business deals or lines of credit, an external audit will be required.
Here are six reasons why audited accounts are important for any company, more importantly, small and medium businesses.
1. OBJECTIVITY
If the accounts are only looked over by an employee or the business owner, it can be easy to miss any warning signs. You're likely to be too close to your own business, so a full audit will give the objectivity that's needed to spot if something's not quite right.
2. EXPERIENCED EYES ON YOUR ACCOUNTS
If your accounts are properly audited, the auditor will have the knowledge and experience to see if there's a problem and know what to do to rectify it.
3. LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES
An audit allows you to look closely at how your finances have been managed over the previous 12 months, and if you encounter any issues, it means that measures can be put in place to avoid the same things happening in the future. It also gives businesses the chance to see how well their internal controls are working and change procedures if necessary.
4. MONEY SAVING
As well as being able to see what activities are too time and resource consuming, an account audit will highlight any unnecessary expenditure that can be cut.
5. FRAUD PREVENTION
Quite often, employee fraud or theft only continues over time because there are no checks or controls in place to discover them. A full audit of your accounts and financial position will make any fraudulent activity obvious and gives you the opportunity to tackle it.
6. INCREASED AVAILABILITY OF CREDIT
Many companies or financial institutions will only consider offering lines of credit to a business with fully audited accounts. While it is possible to have an ad-hoc audit completed when you're turned down for credit for this reason, it's much quicker and easier to have your annual audit details ready for this very reason.
If your company is growing, it may reach a stage where you're required by law to audit your accounts. If you already have an annual audit, it's going to make the process easy and painless for all involved.
© Zawya BusinessPulse 2015

Sunday, January 11, 2015

Embezzlement cases steal cash from most exposed

Sourced from http://www.finditwestvalley.com/politics/embezzlement-cases-steal-cash-from-most-exposed-h49749.html





The scheme Batts-Porter is accused of operating was simple, federal officials say. She managed Social Safety payouts in the trustee's workplace. The workplace was sanctioned by the Social Security Administration to deal with extra than $1 million in payments per year for residents who are incapable of overseeing their finances.
Possibly Center Township Trustee Eugene Akers summed it up greatest: "Right here we are once again. Everyone wants to steal from the poor people."
On Friday, federal officials announced criminal charges alleging that Carmen Batts-Porter, the enterprise counselor for Aker's workplace, stole more than $66,000 in Social Security payments meant for the poor, elderly and disabled.
Batts-Porter, the daughter of Indiana State Rep. Gregory Porter, D-Ind., is accused of using the revenue to pay off credit card bills and take a trip to Miami.
The charges come two months right after the township's former chief monetary officer, Alan Mizen, pleaded guilty to stealing nearly $350,000 in township funds designated to assist the poor. Prosecutors stated Mizen made use of the revenue to invest in a house, jewelry and take vacations to the Caribbean and the Cayman Islands.
In each instances, the victims had been amongst the most vulnerable in the city. And the thefts bring into question the oversight of township government finances.
Center Township is household to some of Marion County's poorest individuals. Almost half of the township's residents live in households exactly where total revenue and added benefits is beneath $25,000. Much more than 36 % live under the federal poverty line, compared with 20 % for the county.
For lots of of these people — like the elderly, the disabled and orphans — the township trustee is the last resort for assistance.
But over the previous 5 years, federal officials allege, Batts-Porter took dollars from the accounts of 11 people today who counted on the trustee's office to handle their Social Security advantages and pay their bills. Investigators mentioned numerous of the victims had no way of recognizing how considerably dollars was taken from them. 1 victim was an orphan in foster care. A further account was in the name of a dead particular person.
The scheme Batts-Porter is accused of operating was simple, federal officials say. She managed Social Safety payouts in the trustee's workplace. The workplace was sanctioned by the Social Security Administration to deal with extra than $1 million in payments per year for residents who are incapable of overseeing their finances.
Normally, the trustee is designated by a court to manage these funds for residents who can not do it themselves or don't have loved ones members to aid.
"Instead of carrying out what she's supposed to do with the money, she took the revenue and wrote checks to pay off her Target credit card bill," stated Bradley Blackington, the senior litigation counsel who is prosecuting the case.
Several of the checks Batts-Porter is alleged to have written to pay off her bills had memo lines with the beneficiary's name. One particular, according to a probable bring about affidavit, study "load funds onto purchasing card."
You can read more on http://www.finditwestvalley.com/politics/embezzlement-cases-steal-cash-from-most-exposed-h49749.html